few entries I mentioned earlier about the training which organizes one of the brokerage houses. I was, I listened and I think the time to be used for the benefit. In training I heard a joke about the system which for me is very interesting and it reassured me even more convinced that the human psyche and what is going on in his head is most important.
One of the men talked about leading scientists experiment on a group of 10 students. Unfortunately, I do not know the name of the experiment to confirm what This was an experiment and whether it actually took place. As anyone heard of this I ask for the link - reading your blog and I will be able to be more familiar with the topic.
generally looked like an experiment. It was a time around the year 1980 where access to computers and the historical data was not as widespread as today. The researchers based on historical data created a system. For historical data, perform well and gave everyone who applied to make the rules - as every system that is optimized for historical data. The researchers told the students play set system - lay in the loophole that students did not know that the researchers suggested to the historical data and told to play them, the students were convinced that they play on real data. Simply, students were given charts that were drawn with a while ago not knowing that they're playing on the old seals and openings prices. In this way the researchers knew how to keep the market and watched the reactions of students to identify the system.
results of this experiment were such that only a gain of two students and the rest of the loss.
What made that a system which operated at 100% successful in only 20% of cases? Psyche + doświadcznie or lack thereof. Acc. me, a person can have a very good system but does not know how to react to his psyche when it has 4 losses in a row, 6 losses in a row, 8 losses in a row. Added to this is lack of confidence in the system, generally a man too often change the systems and methods of play - good idea to test a system for a minimum of three months to determine if there is something meaningful.
As said another of the trainers. As we began to study medicine, and within three months resigned to become an architect then resigned within three months of becoming a computer scientist for the benefit of any profession, etc are we in this have not learned the way - so is the testing of systems.
0 comments:
Post a Comment